Lame
K Ross

email your friends about this site

share

follow this author

subscribe

send a message to this author

contact

reward this author with a star!

stars

follow this author

subscribe

Home

go to your pnn homepage

Start_blogging

start blogging

Helpinappropriate content
LOGIN LOGOUT Home
Family
well, you know
Food & wine
Full of bite!
Well-being
body and soul
Relationships
working them out - or not
Politics
news, views
Diversions
Your daily dose
Arts & Literature
Catch some 'cultcha'
Living
the good, the bad, the messy
World
Going global
Etc.
everything else
Style
cheap, chic and unique!

Image

The Vote

The Vote

Today is 13 October 2008, the night before our Ferderal election, and I still find it difficult to find anyone worthy of my vote.

The party leaders are not giving us anything positive to make our decissions on: all of the information is negative towards one or more of their opponents; the leader's debates were nothing more than four of the leaders ganging up on the fifth(not that I have any significant respect for him); and I've been able to get no one to show support for Bill C-221.

From the local candidates, |'ve heard absolutly nothing except for an individual who came to my door looking for support for the Liberal Party. When I asked him about Bill C-221, he knew nothing about it.

Even with that, the liberal candidate, the incumbent, is the only one that I have any inclination to honour with my vote. However, I don't want to see Mr. Dion as our next Prime Minister and refuse to have anything to do with his gaining that position.

So, what to do?

I wish everyone luck tomorrow and hope that you have an easier time making your decission than I'm having.


11Vote!
Comments (0)

Like this story? Share the news by clicking below:
This is a permanent link to this article. A great way to save it.
PermaLink
Post your article on Digg and let others vote on it.
Digg
Technorati is a blog indexing site.
Technorati
del.icio.us is a social bookmarking site.
Delicious
Kirtsy is a social bookmarking site featuring voting.
Kirtsy_addicon

Pensions

Pensions

I joined the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) in November of 1965.  The Canada Pension Plan was brought into effect 1 January 1966.  Consequently, I was never involved in any briefing for the new CPP, I was paying into both pension plans almost from the star.

My understanding, and this is the understanding of most everyone I knew, of the military pension, was that for each year of service you would accummulate a portion of your annual salary for the average of your best six years of pay.

Pretty straight forward.

Now, for a few minor complications.
  1. If you took a release within the first 10 years, you would not receive a pension, but instead a return of contributions.
  2. If you serve 25 years or longer you get the 1/50th per year for the number of years served.
  3. if you take your release in less than 25 years, then you will be penalized 5% for each year less than the prescribed 25 years.
Still pretty clear.  For example, in my case, I took my release with 24 years service. Therefore, I accummulated 24/50ths or 48% of my best 6 pay years. Since I served 1 year less than the required 25, I incurred a 5% penalty. Therefore, my pension is 43% of the annual average of my best 6 years of pay.

There's one other thing that comes into play, and that's what's called "Indexing". What this means is, I will continue to draw my pension at the established amount, without any increases including cost of living, until a combination of age and service time equals the magic number of 85. At this time, my pension will be indexed, increasing by the amount of the "cost of living" for the period since my retirement.

So, that's the general understanding of the military pension and nothing was ever said about a reduction at age 65.

Now, as for the CPP, I have paid into it at the maximum rate for my entire military carreer. Furthermore, I have been employed full time since taking my release from the military and have contributed to CPP at the maximum rate for the full time (and I expect to be employed at least to age sixety five  and continueing to contribute the maximum to CPP.

As you can see, a military member contributes to two pension plans. So how can they possibly take one away?

Another thing: military personnel contribute the maximum premium to EI and are not allowed to receive bennefits.  It's like paying life insurance premiums know that the only benneficiary is the insurance company, who get to keep all of the money you paid in premiums!

NICE!

11Vote!
Comments (0)

Like this story? Share the news by clicking below:
This is a permanent link to this article. A great way to save it.
PermaLink
Post your article on Digg and let others vote on it.
Digg
Technorati is a blog indexing site.
Technorati
del.icio.us is a social bookmarking site.
Delicious
Kirtsy is a social bookmarking site featuring voting.
Kirtsy_addicon

Make a comment



about us | contact | terms | privacy | goodies | advertise | help | press | feedback